B-schools To File Petition Against AICTE
09 February 2011

Associations of B-schools across the country, AIMS and EPSI, will file writ petition against the AICTE by February 14


Condemning the decision of the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), the Association of Indian Management Schools (AIMS) and the Education Promotion Society of India (EPSI) have decided to file a writ petition in the Delhi High Court saying that it could hamper the quality of management education in the country. The petition will be filed by February 14, 2011.

The institutes are hoping to counter a notification issued by the AICTE on December 28, 2010, which was in response to a public interest litigation (PIL) filed in the Punjab and Haryana High Courts. The PIL sought to regulate the admission process and curriculum for all Post Graduate Diploma in Management (PGDM) courses. The notification dictated that B-schools cannot conduct their tests for the PGDM courses. A few of these institutes include Xavier Labour Relations Institute, SP Jain, Birla Institute of Management Technology and Management Development Institute among others.

Several management schools are also against the decision of the Council that makes it mandatory for every approved PGDM programme to be conducted over 24 months.

Most of the institutes accept scores of entrance exams like CAT, XAT, MAT and ICFAI. There are also institutes that enrol students for their PGDM programme without any entrance test.

The notification also prevents institutions from conducting their second round of selection to their PGDM programme – group discussions (GD) and personal interviews (PI), and have them conducted by the state government instead. The Council also made it binding that only the competent authority of the respective state governments can conduct the admission to the PGDM programme of the management schools approved by it. The aim of the notification is to bring down the number of admission tests that students have to take, reduce travel time and costs that students incur on the same, and control the malpractices that a number of institutes resort to during admissions.

More than 250 management schools are members of the EPSI.

The schools also say that the following the notification would lead to destruction of the autonomy they have in the admission procedure. More than 200 B-schools that met in the national capital yesterday are deciding on the steps that need to be taken.




Readers Feedback

prof.p.narayana reddy Thu, 2011-02-10 06:07

Dear Editor, I did read the comment on the decision of AIMS and EPSI to challenge the AICTE's decision. Association of Indian Management Schools(AIMS)is one of the forums having largest network in India. Please mention that it is not AIMA it is AIMS.AIMS is also conducting ATMA test. It is recognised by AICTE for admissions into pgdm programmes. regards dr.p.narayana reddy prof and head, school of Management Studies cbit hyderabad.

Comments


prof.p.narayana reddy (not verified)
petition against aicte
Dear Editor, I did read the comment on the decision of AIMS and EPSI to challenge the AICTE's decision. Association of Indian Management Schools(AIMS)is one of the forums having largest network in India. Please mention that it is not AIMA it is AIMS.AIMS is also conducting ATMA test. It is recognised by AICTE for admissions into pgdm programmes. regards dr.p.narayana reddy prof and head, school of Management Studies cbit hyderabad.
Tarun Kumar (not verified)
B-schools To File Petition
All of us know that almost all the B-Schools, except a few at the top, hardly have any transparent governance structure. But solution to these problems cannot be find in taking extreme measures. The entire gamut of B-School governance and for that matter governance of all technical and professional institutions requires thorough and involved brainstorming amongst all the stakeholders. And it is needless to mention that students, parents and faculty are equally important stakeholders. Futhermore, policy shift should be outcome of an elaborate exercise involving independent experts. Jumping from one extreme to other extreme puts entire system in a serious jeopardy.
Dr. Sandhir Sharma (not verified)
AICTE Notification
1. Autonomy of the institutes should not be withdrawn. But surely AICTE should take concrete steps to govern the institutions. AICTE is very poor in the governance part. 2. Fee of PGDM should be rationalise. There are institutes that are offering PGDM ranging 4 Lakh to 10 Lakh per annum. This gap should be minimized. 3. Quality of academic delivery for PGDM must be checked carefully by AICTE. All PGDM should be affiliated to one or other state universities necessarily. 4. There must be proper governance of course designing and teaching pedagogy. 5. AICTE should act as SEBI and RBI and institutes should not mind AICTE's intervention.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Sign up for your free email EDU newsletter
Enter your email
YOUR OPINION
Will The Liberal Arts Model Redefine Our Educational Institutions?
Poll result:

Yes   (76%)
 
No   (17%)
 
Can't Tell   (7%)